[NEohioPAL]An Open Letter to the Theater Community
LNehring at aol.com
LNehring at aol.com
Sat Jan 29 00:41:07 PST 2005
-------------------------------1106988067
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I have spent a large portion of this evening trying to craft a letter in
support of what Randy Rollison wrote in his open letter today and I am a bit
dismayed by the "from the hip" response by an unsigned email address. I do not
believe that Randy was getting on a soapbox or lecturing inappropriately. He
wrote the letter as the Executive/Artistic Director of Cleveland Public
Theatre, as I respond now as the Artistic Director of the Cleveland Shakespeare
Festival. I think it is unfortunate that _dafio at msn.com_
(mailto:dafio at msn.com) has chosen to be offended by Randy's statements and observations. I
respect Mr. Rollison and trust that he would only post such an open letter if he
feels that this problem is serious enough that we, as a community, must put a
stop to it or, at the very least, reduce its frequency.
In the eleven years since I moved here, I have seen numerous occasions where
the irresponsible behavior of an individual has almost killed the production
of a show. I have been involved with shows where a fellow actor was too
drunk to perform. I have replaced actors who dropped out in the middle of the
run. Been forced to replace tech staff at the last minute because they had
over-committed their time and were not getting the work done. I am envious of
anyone who has not experienced these types of eleventh hour nightmares.
As a producing director, I have had many discussions with other producers
and directors about this specific problem. So far it has been handled
one-on-one, with a director speaking with an actor, or a producer talking with a staff
member, but perhaps the time has come to deal with this as a community.
More and more theatres are bringing in guest artists and directors from out of
town. This presents a great opportunity for us to show that Cleveland is a
city with talented and skilled theatre artists and technicians. However, when
one of these guests sees unprofessional behavior cause a disruption, it is that
behavior which they remember, despite all the other professionals with whom
they have worked. Ultimately it is not the responsibility of the director to
straighten out the individual problem. It is the responsibility of the
individual to behave in a professional manner, and "do your job." This is not some
college theatre challenge to see how drunk is too drunk to perform, or some
manner of proving that a person can do their job perfectly well with a buzz.
That is a dangerous gamble and not fair to your fellow actors or techies.
Every director I know has a list in their head of people with whom they will
not work. From experience they know that the names on that list are
untrustworthy. If another director calls seeking a reference, they have to be honest.
This is a slow and imperfect process, not meant to be a kind of black list,
but a cautionary filter to prevent problems before they can begin. When the
fate of a theatre depends on the income from each show produced, there is
little room for mistakes. In the current economy, a theatre can take no chances
that a foundation representative, corporate sponsor, or individual patron will
witness this kind of problem and decide that it directly reflects the
professionalism of the theatre and discontinue funding.
I will freely admit that I have not always been the most prepared actor, and
have over-committed myself at times in my career. I am not taking a
"holier-than-thou" stance by any means. However I am completely responsible for my
own choices and actions and pay the price of my mistakes. This is also not an
attempt to condemn people who have been forced to step out of a commitment for
legitimate, serious reasons. Family emergencies happen, and we must all be
supportive when they do. In the same vein we can all respect when more
lucrative opportunities arise, and cheer for a fellow artist who gets a shot at
earning a living in this difficult profession. We must keep in mind, though,
that every production is a team effort. When one person succeeds, we all
benefit, and when one person drops the ball, we all suffer.
As a final thought, I respect the fact that Randy has brought up an
important challenge we face if we wish to be seen nationally as a talented and
skilled arts community. He signed his name to a challenging letter and presented it
in a widely-read forum. He is intelligent enough to know that many who would
read it would not need to change their behavior, but he is also dedicated
enough to local artists to want an open discussion on this serious issue.
Cleveland Public Theatre is a leader in bringing artists to Cleveland in order to
help our art scene grow. He sees first-hand the impressions with which those
artists leave. If he feels we are not presenting ourselves in the best way,
then I believe him and want to thank him for calling our attention to it.
Respectfully,
Lawrence Nehring
Artistic Director
The Cleveland Shakespeare Festival
www.cleveshakes.org
"Be safe; act dangerous."
-------------------------------1106988067
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3DUS-ASCII">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2523" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=3Drole_body style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY:=20=
Arial"=20
bottomMargin=3D7 leftMargin=3D7 topMargin=3D7 rightMargin=3D7><FONT id=3Drol=
e_document=20
face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D2>
<DIV>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2523" name=3DGENERATOR><FONT id=3Drolx_doc=
ument=20
face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D2>I have spent a large portion of this e=
vening=20
trying to craft a letter in support of what Randy Rollison wrote in his open=
=20
letter today and I am a bit dismayed by the "from the hip" response by an=20
unsigned email address. I do not believe that Randy was getting on a soapbox=
or=20
lecturing inappropriately. He wrote the letter as the Executive/Artist=
ic=20
Director of Cleveland Public Theatre, as I respond now as the Artistic Direc=
tor=20
of the Cleveland Shakespeare Festival. I think it is unfortunate that=20=
<A=20
title=3Dmailto:dafio at msn.com=20
href=3D"mailto:dafio at msn.com">dafio at msn.com</A> has chosen to be offend=
ed by=20
Randy's statements and observations. I respect Mr. Rollison and trust that h=
e=20
would only post such an open letter if he feels that this problem is serious=
=20
enough that we, as a community, must put a stop to it or, at the very least,=
=20
reduce its frequency. </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>In the eleven years since I moved here, I have seen numerous occasions=20
where the irresponsible behavior of an individual has almost killed the=20
production of a show. I have been involved with shows where a fellow a=
ctor=20
was too drunk to perform. I have replaced actors who dropped out in the=
=20
middle of the run. Been forced to replace tech staff at the last=20
minute because they had over-committed their time and were not getting the w=
ork=20
done. I am envious of anyone who has not experienced these types of=20
eleventh hour nightmares.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>As a producing director, I have had many discussions with other=20
producers and directors about this specific problem. So far it has been=
=20
handled one-on-one, with a director speaking with an actor, or a producer=20
talking with a staff member, but perhaps the time has come to deal with=
=20
this as a community. More and more theatres are bringing in guest arti=
sts=20
and directors from out of town. This presents a great opportunity for us to=20=
show=20
that Cleveland is a city with talented and skilled theatre artists and=20
technicians. However, when one of these guests sees unprofessional beha=
vior=20
cause a disruption, it is that behavior which they remember, despite al=
l=20
the other professionals with whom they have worked. Ultimately it is no=
t=20
the responsibility of the director to straighten out the individual problem.=
It=20
is the responsibility of the individual to behave in a professional manner,=20=
and=20
"do your job." This is not some college theatre challenge to=
see=20
how drunk is too drunk to perform, or some manner of proving that a person c=
an=20
do their job perfectly well with a buzz. That is a dangerous gamble and=
not=20
fair to your fellow actors or techies.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Every director I know has a list in their head of people with whom they=
=20
will not work. From experience they know that the names on that list are=20
untrustworthy. If another director calls seeking a reference, they have to b=
e=20
honest. This is a slow and imperfect process, not meant to be a kind of blac=
k=20
list, but a cautionary filter to prevent problems before they can begin. Whe=
n=20
the fate of a theatre depends on the income from each show produced, there i=
s=20
little room for mistakes. In the current economy, a theatre can take no chan=
ces=20
that a foundation representative, corporate sponsor, or individual patron wi=
ll=20
witness this kind of problem and decide that it directly reflects the=20
professionalism of the theatre and discontinue funding.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I will freely admit that I have not always been the most prepared actor=
,=20
and have over-committed myself at times in my career. I am not taking a=20
"holier-than-thou" stance by any means. However I am completely responsible=20=
for=20
my own choices and actions and pay the price of my mistakes. This is also=20
not an attempt to condemn people who have been forced to step out of a=20
commitment for legitimate, serious reasons. Family emergencies happen,=
and=20
we must all be supportive when they do. In the same vein we can all=20
respect when more lucrative opportunities arise, and cheer for a fellow arti=
st=20
who gets a shot at earning a living in this difficult profession. We m=
ust=20
keep in mind, though, that every production is a team effort. When one perso=
n=20
succeeds, we all benefit, and when one person drops the ball, we all=20
suffer.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>As a final thought, I respect the fact that Randy has brought up an=20
important challenge we face if we wish to be seen nationally as a talented a=
nd=20
skilled arts community. He signed his name to a challenging letter and prese=
nted=20
it in a widely-read forum. He is intelligent enough to know that many who wo=
uld=20
read it would not need to change their behavior, but he is also dedicated en=
ough=20
to local artists to want an open discussion on this serious issue. Cleveland=
=20
Public Theatre is a leader in bringing artists to Cleveland in order to help=
our=20
art scene grow. He sees first-hand the impressions with which those artists=20
leave. If he feels we are not presenting ourselves in the best way, then I=20
believe him and want to thank him for calling our attention to it.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Respectfully,</DIV>
<DIV><FONT lang=3D0 face=3DArial size=3D2 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" PTSIZE=3D"10"=
>Lawrence=20
Nehring<BR>Artistic Director<BR>The Cleveland Shakespeare=20
Festival<BR>www.cleveshakes.org<BR>"Be safe; act=20
dangerous."</FONT></DIV></FONT></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>
-------------------------------1106988067--
More information about the NEohioPAL
mailing list