[NEohioPAL] time to boycott Hollywood

[Conspicuous Chick]

IMO, making a film version of a book is different than remaking a film.
Different mediums with require different interpretations (same as film to
stage, vice versa, or book to stage). Remaking an already existing film,
especially within 20 years, when the first one is so beloved is a lack of
imagination and sacrificing creativity to cheap profit. As someone else
pointed out, people will consume what's put in front of them (more than not)
so there will never be enough people 'boycotting' to make a difference. Only
overt expressions of protest will matter.




On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 11:05 AM, James Kosmatka <jkosmatka at gmail.com>wrote:

>  Whereas the Golden Age of cinema was rife with thoroughly original
> stories, like Cleopatra, Gone with the Wind, The Wizard of Oz, and Double
> Indemnity, right?
>
>
>
> I really have to wonder: who cares?  If you don’t like it, don’t go see it.
> But the fact of the matter is, lots and lots of great films are remakes or
> updates or adaptations. Scarface with Al Pacino is a remake. Take a look at
> the highest grossing films (adjusted for inflation) in North America. Top
> ten: Gone with the Wind (novel), Sound of Music (musical), Ten Comandments
> (book), Titanic (historical event), Jaws (novel), Doctor Zhivago (novel),
> Exorcist (novel), and Snow White (folk tale).  That’s eight of the top 10
> (the other two are ET and Star Wars, and you’d be hard pressed to find an
> element in Star Wars that George Lucas doesn’t acknowledge adapting from
> Kurosawa or Shakespeare or the moon Mimas.) Hell, Romeo and Juliet was an
> adaptation and that was 400 years ago.  The quality of films coming out of
> Hollywood may be declining, I can hardly blame the executives. There was
> clearly a time when literate scripts and character development drew
> audiences (The Graduate, Gone with the Wind, Close Encounters of the Third
> Kind), but people obviously do not, by and large, have a problem with
> one-dimensional escapist pablum. If anything, this points to a drastic shift
> in the way we perceive the world. Critical thinking skills, an appreciation
> of the way we speak and write, the ability to focus for long periods of
> time, these things have all been sacrificed. I say we boycott parents who
> don’t read to their children, who use the TV and video games as babysitters,
> who don’t take an active interest in their children’s learning.  It’s the
> same reason someone like Sarah Palin can be considered an authority on
> anything, or why people can be bullied and blindsided into making economic
> decisions counter to their own best interests.  We’re given the culture (and
> economy and government) we as a society deserve.
>
>
>
> /soapbox
>
>
>
> James
>
>
>
> *From:* neohiopal-bounces at listserve.com [mailto:
> neohiopal-bounces at listserve.com] *On Behalf Of *Brian Del Bianco
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 13, 2010 8:12 AM
> *To:* NeOhio List
> *Subject:* [NEohioPAL] time to boycott Hollywood
>
>
>
> I've been long aware of the rapidly declining lack of imagination in
> Hollywood (turning Bewitched into a movie?!?) but THIS....
>
>
> Broderick approves 'Bueller' remake
>
> Jan. 12, 2010, 4:53 PM EST
>
> Matthew Broderick<http://movies.msn.com/celebrities/celebrity/matthew-broderick/>has given Hollywood bosses the green light to remake his classic
> movie <http://movies.msn.com/movies/article.aspx?news=451447&GT1=28101> "Ferris
> Bueller's Day Off<http://movies.msn.com/movies/movie/ferris-bueller's-day-off/>,"
> but doesn't want any involvement in it.
>
> Rumors have swirled for months suggesting studio chiefs are nursing plans
> to bring the cult 1980s comedy back to the big screen<http://movies.msn.com/movies/article.aspx?news=451447&GT1=28101>in either a sequel or a remake.
>
> Broderick has now commented on the reports, insisting he would be "happy"
> with plans to bring back rebellious teen Ferris, as long as the project is
> handed to a completely new cast.
>
> He tells Cinematical, "(A remake) would be fine. I would be perfectly happy
> for somebody to do that. I probably wouldn't enjoy (having a role in the
> film). I would rather leave what we did as our thing."
>
>
>
>
> What is next??  Perhaps a Star Wars remake?  Maybe "The Muppet Movie" with
> an all human cast??  I overheard talk at work about somebody seeing a
> trailer for an A-Team movie-when will the madness end?
>
>
> -Brian
>
>
>
> ***********************************************
> HELP FIND MY STOLEN BASS!
>
> http://www.facebook.com/group.php?v=app_2373072738&gid=232052263100#/group.php?v=wall&gid=232052263100
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> Hotmail: Free, trusted and rich email service. Get it now.<http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/196390708/direct/01/>
>
> ______________________________________
> CLEVELAND THEATER COLLECTIVE: Check out our newly redesigned website: at
> http://www.clevelandtheater.com.
> ______________________________________
> NEohioPAL is SELF-SERVE. If you need to unsubscribe, change from digest to
> one-at-a-time delivery or vice-versa, go on hiatus while out of town, switch
> from mime to plain text or vice-versa, etc. check out the FAQS at
> http://www.fredsternfeld.com.
> ______________________________________
> please consider a voluntary contribution to support Neohiopal -
> http://www.fredsternfeld.com/faqs.htm#support
> ______________________________________
> Disclaimer: The facts and/or opinions expressed in this message are solely
> those of the person in the 'from' or 'reply-to' header. The fact that this
> message is posted should in no way be taken as an endorsement by the
> administrator of this list. Subscribers should perform due diligence for all
> goods, services and activities promoted on NEohioPAL.
> _____________________________________
> NEohioPAL mailing list
> http://mailman.listserve.com/listmanager/listinfo/neohiopal
>
>


-- 
Everything you wanted to know about being a living donor but were afraid to
ask: www.LivingDonor101.com

Be Beautiful without Going Broke at Conspicuous Chicks Corner:
www.conspicuouschick.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.neohiopal.org/pipermail/neohiopal-neohiopal.org/attachments/20100113/3fe0d8a8/attachment-0004.htm>